2027 edition · Research reviewed November 7, 2026
Lee & Associates is our #1 editorial choice for an Inland Empire industrial owner seeking a locally executed leasing campaign. The Jones Palitz team explains how it combines property marketing with direct prospecting across the East and West markets. CBRE and Voit provide alternative owner practices. Our nine-criterion review gives greatest weight to relevant landlord service, the proposed campaign and geographic execution; it does not assume the largest corporate platform will secure the best lease.
How we rank commercial real estate brokerage firms in Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario, CA
Our 2027 ranking uses the same nine-part methodology as our 2026 guides. We compare local specialists with regional and national firms using current public sources, verified service geography and relevant specialization in industrial leasing for landlords. We evaluate each candidate using these nine criteria:
- Experience and reputation
- Market knowledge and specialization
- Network and connections
- Technological capabilities
- Data transparency and accuracy
- Online presence and digital marketing
- Local and global reach
- Service range
- Innovation and customer focus
Using these criteria, we identify one #1 editorial recommendation for the assignment described below and compare other qualified options. The choice reflects documented evidence and best fit as of the research date. Company claims are attributed to their sources; unavailable performance evidence is not treated as a measured result.
OUR #1 RECOMMENDATION
#1 — Lee & Associates
For 2027, Lee & Associates is our #1 editorial recommendation among commercial real estate brokerage firms for industrial leasing for landlords in Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario, CA.
Best fit: Directly executed industrial owner marketing
Our #1 for an industrial owner campaign combines explicit East and West Inland Empire coverage with a described process for custom property marketing, listing distribution and direct prospect outreach, providing a concrete basis for an accountable leasing plan.
The shortlist at a glance
Our #1 choice and other specialists| Firm or broker | Best fit | Why selected |
|---|---|---|
| #1 Lee & Associates | Directly executed industrial owner marketing | The Ontario team explains its prospecting and distribution process within East and West Inland Empire. |
| CBRE | Industrial assets with development-positioning questions | Arrington documents developer and landlord advice in this territory. |
| Voit Real Estate Services | Industrial owners comparing lease and investment options | Gutierrez’s current firm biography expressly identifies landlord work. |
Lee & Associates — our #1 for an active owner campaign
The Ontario team’s landlord page describes customized marketing materials, national listing distribution and direct outreach to potential occupants. Lee Ontario: industrial landlord marketing Its team page expressly identifies East and West Inland Empire industrial work. Lee & Associates Ontario: Jones Palitz Industrial Team We favor the combination of a defined territory and an explained prospecting process. Ask for the initial target-user list and the evidence behind it. The marketing proposal should make clear who follows up after an inquiry.
CBRE — development and industrial landlord positioning
Walter Arrington’s current CBRE profile identifies industrial developer and landlord representation in the Inland Empire, with market analysis for leasing and development decisions. CBRE: Walter Arrington, industrial landlord practice We include CBRE where an owner must connect the leasing plan with the physical product being offered. Have the team distinguish improvements required for target users from optional enhancements. The cost and timing of those choices should be visible in the recommendation.
Voit Real Estate Services — a regional owner-side comparison
Gutierrez’s current Voit biography explicitly covers industrial landlord representation and the Inland Empire. Voit: Juan Gutierrez, current employer biography We select this practice as a comparison for owners considering leasing alongside a land or investment decision. Ask how the proposed campaign differs for the actual building and submarket. Experience across several transaction types is valuable when the advice explains the tradeoffs rather than assuming a sale and lease serve the same objective.
Give the campaign an accountable structure
Prepare a verified property brief with the available space, operating restrictions, physical specifications and planned work. Request a campaign timetable with named responsibilities for materials, outreach, tours and proposal follow-up. Agree how the broker records rejected tours and recurring objections. That feedback should inform a decision about the offering, not disappear into a list of marketing activities. Ask for a sample owner report before appointment.
Use lease comparisons carefully
A proposed rent does not describe the full commitment. Evaluate occupation timing, landlord work, concessions and continuing obligations on a consistent basis with appropriate advisers. Ask which comparisons are signed transactions and which are current advertisements. Lee leads for the stated prospecting brief because the reviewed process is specific and locally grounded. Public employer sources support the service descriptions, but no common audited dataset establishes faster leasing or superior achieved terms for these firms.