2027 edition · Research reviewed November 7, 2026
Savills is our #1 editorial recommendation for an office tenant making a strategic Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale decision. Cresa and LevRose are the selected alternatives. This assessment considers all nine firm criteria and favors the link between the occupier’s business requirements and the proposed office plan. The most useful initial comparison is not the firms’ size; it is whether the assigned people can explain the decision and the assumptions that drive it.
How we rank commercial real estate brokerage firms in Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale, AZ
Our 2027 ranking uses the same nine-part methodology as our 2026 guides. We compare local specialists with regional and national firms using current public sources, verified service geography and relevant specialization in office tenant representation. We evaluate each candidate using these nine criteria:
- Experience and reputation
- Market knowledge and specialization
- Network and connections
- Technological capabilities
- Data transparency and accuracy
- Online presence and digital marketing
- Local and global reach
- Service range
- Innovation and customer focus
Using these criteria, we identify one #1 editorial recommendation for the assignment described below and compare other qualified options. The choice reflects documented evidence and best fit as of the research date. Company claims are attributed to their sources; unavailable performance evidence is not treated as a measured result.
OUR #1 RECOMMENDATION
#1 — Savills
For 2027, Savills is our #1 editorial recommendation among commercial real estate brokerage firms for office tenant representation in Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale, AZ.
Best fit: Office strategy tied to organizational requirements
Our #1 office-tenant choice combines documented Phoenix workplace and workforce-advisory services with a current practitioner’s headquarters experience, closely matching an office decision that must follow the company’s business plan.
The shortlist at a glance
Our #1 choice and other specialists| Firm or broker | Best fit | Why selected |
|---|---|---|
| #1 Savills | Office strategy tied to organizational requirements | Local workplace services and named headquarters experience support the brief. |
| Cresa | An occupier-focused advisory appointment | The current Phoenix leader documents that representation model. |
| LevRose | A focused local office search | Named Greater Phoenix office and tenant evidence supports the comparison. |
Savills — our #1 for a business-led office decision
Savills’s Phoenix office identifies office-occupier services, workplace strategy and workforce analytics. Michael White’s current biography documents headquarters assignments. Savills: Phoenix occupier services Savills: Michael White, Phoenix tenant representation We prefer that combination where the company must connect its premises with organizational requirements. Ask the team to establish the questions management needs answered before producing a shortlist. The relevant deliverable is a reasoned comparison of feasible options, with uncertainties made visible.
Cresa — a clearly stated occupier model
Scott Maxwell’s current Phoenix leadership profile identifies an occupier-focused advisory practice. Cresa: Scott Maxwell, Phoenix occupier leadership We select Cresa for an office tenant that wants to compare the representation model and proposed working relationship. Request the named office team and examples close to the company’s size and requirements. A clear client orientation supports the interview, but it does not establish how much attention any one adviser can devote to the engagement.
LevRose — a local office alternative
Aaron Norwood’s primary biography identifies Greater Phoenix office experience, and his TCN directory profile explicitly documents tenant representation. LevRose: Aaron Norwood, Phoenix office and industrial practice TCN Worldwide: Aaron Norwood, landlord and tenant representation We include LevRose when a local team and a focused group of submarkets are central to the brief. Ask how it would compare the candidate buildings and explain the differences to decision-makers who do not work in real estate. Confirm the current team rather than relying on a historic transaction list.
Keep the options comparable
Define the business’s expected occupancy, working pattern, visitor needs and decision date. Compare renewal with relocation using consistent assumptions, and record which costs or delivery dates are still estimates. Ask how a change in the staffing plan would affect the recommendation. An attractive tour should not hide a mismatch between the premises and the organization that must use them.
Use the proposal to test the recommendation
Savills leads because the reviewed local services and named headquarters experience fit this strategic brief. A different working arrangement or a narrower local requirement may favor an alternative. Ask for a sample decision report, references and an explanation of potential conflicts. Agree who coordinates information from building teams and workplace specialists. The public evidence supports an editorial choice of advisers; it does not supply a common audited savings measure or prove that one firm will negotiate the best result for every tenant.