2027 edition · Research reviewed November 7, 2026
Boston–Cambridge–Nashua calls for a shortlist that separates the assignment from the address. A Cambridge occupier, suburban industrial owner and Nashua investor may need different teams. Our 2027 brokerage selections are R.W. Holmes, Hunneman, Colliers, Cresa and Venture Retail Partners. We reviewed the nine firm criteria and current primary evidence. These recommendations describe useful interview candidates, not a statistically measured hierarchy of client outcomes.
How we rank commercial real estate brokerage firms in Boston–Cambridge–Nashua, MA–NH
Our 2027 ranking uses the same nine-part methodology as our 2026 guides. We compare local specialists with regional and national firms using current public sources, verified service geography and relevant specialization. We evaluate each candidate using these nine criteria:
- Experience and reputation
- Market knowledge and specialization
- Network and connections
- Technological capabilities
- Data transparency and accuracy
- Online presence and digital marketing
- Local and global reach
- Service range
- Innovation and customer focus
Using these criteria, we identify one #1 editorial recommendation for the assignment described below and compare other qualified options. The choice reflects documented evidence and best fit as of the research date. Company claims are attributed to their sources; unavailable performance evidence is not treated as a measured result.
OUR #1 RECOMMENDATION
#1 — Hunneman
For 2027, Hunneman is our #1 editorial recommendation among commercial real estate brokerage firms in Boston–Cambridge–Nashua, MA–NH.
Best fit: Transactions requiring ownership-service coordination
Our leading regional choice combines leasing advice with a documented Nashua acquisition and management assignment, connecting Boston-area brokerage to actual southern New Hampshire execution.
The shortlist at a glance
Our #1 choice and other specialists| Firm or broker | Best fit | Why selected |
|---|---|---|
| #1 Hunneman | Transactions requiring ownership-service coordination | A named Nashua assignment documents acquisition and management roles. |
| R.W. Holmes | Suburban office, industrial and flex decisions | The independent practice identifies those asset specialties. |
| Colliers | Coordinated Massachusetts and New Hampshire coverage | Distinct Boston and NH practices are documented. |
| Cresa | Occupier requirements | The current Boston office explicitly serves occupiers. |
| Venture Retail Partners | Store and retail-property decisions | Current services identify both retail representation sides. |
R.W. Holmes — a suburban office and industrial specialist
R.W. Holmes identifies an independent Greater Boston practice spanning office, industrial, flex and laboratory space. R.W. Holmes: Greater Boston practice We would include it when a client needs close comparison of suburban buildings and multiple occupancy options. Ask the proposed team to define its strongest towns and building types before presenting a regional search. Its stated specialty provides a reason to interview the firm; it does not establish equal expertise in every neighborhood or an automatic New Hampshire mandate.
Hunneman — transactions linked to ownership execution
Hunneman offers leasing and advisory services, and its October 2026 announcement identifies buyer representation and subsequent management at 4 Bud Way in Nashua. Hunneman: leasing and advisory Hunneman: 4 Bud Way acquisition and management, October 2026 We select it for a client considering how a transaction connects to financing and future operations. Request separate responsibilities for acquisition advice and ongoing services. The Nashua example supports actual cross-border activity, while the proposed team must still explain its suitability for the client’s specific property.
Colliers — Massachusetts work with a distinct New Hampshire team
Colliers documents office, industrial and flex representation through Boston-based Sean Hannigan, alongside a separately identified New Hampshire brokerage practice. Colliers: Sean Hannigan Colliers: New Hampshire brokerage and management We include it when an assignment crosses those territories and needs coordinated local execution. Have the proposal identify which office owns each stage of the work. A shared brand should not obscure who inspects properties, verifies assumptions and remains accountable to the client.
Cresa — an occupier-focused brief
Cresa’s Boston practice explicitly represents occupiers. Cresa: Boston occupier practice That is a useful comparison for a business choosing its own premises, particularly when the real estate decision has several internal stakeholders. Ask the team to present renewal, relocation and other viable paths against the same operating brief. Confirm the people assigned to the specific office, industrial or specialized-use requirement rather than relying on the firm’s broad industry list.
Venture Retail Partners — a dedicated retail conversation
Venture identifies tenant and landlord retail services across Greater Boston and the Northeast. Venture Retail Partners: current retail practice We select the local specialist for briefs involving store expansion or retail leasing. Define the representation side and trade area before discussing possible sites. The retail guides compare individual practitioners separately because a firm’s broad footprint does not by itself establish the right personal lead.
Turn the comparison into a decision
Send finalists a concise scope, timetable and geographic boundary. Request relevant references, a conflict review and a sample decision report. Compare evidence quality and proposed attention rather than company size. Keep brokerage, management and capital-service fees visible as separate items, and identify any service that requires an additional appointment.