Skip to content
TOP COMMERCIAL
REAL ESTATE BROKERS

2027 ANNUAL EDITION / BROKERAGE FIRMS

Top Commercial Real Estate Firms In Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY By Category — 2027

2027 edition · Research reviewed November 8, 2026

CBRE Upstate NY is our 2027 editorial #1 commercial brokerage firm for a Buffalo-area office owner seeking a named local leasing team and a broader advisory platform. Cushman & Wakefield | Pyramid Brokerage Company and Newmark Ciminelli are the principal comparisons, with Donovan Real Estate Services considered for retail-led work. All nine firm criteria inform the recommendation. We select for a defined assignment, without treating brand recognition, company size or a transaction announcement as proof of superior investment performance.

How we rank commercial real estate brokerage firms in Buffalo–Cheektowaga–Niagara Falls, NY

Our 2027 ranking uses the same nine-part methodology as our 2026 guides. We compare local specialists with regional and national firms using current public sources, verified service geography and relevant specialization. We evaluate each candidate using these nine criteria:

  1. Experience and reputation
  2. Market knowledge and specialization
  3. Network and connections
  4. Technological capabilities
  5. Data transparency and accuracy
  6. Online presence and digital marketing
  7. Local and global reach
  8. Service range
  9. Innovation and customer focus

Using these criteria, we identify one #1 editorial recommendation for the assignment described below and compare other qualified options. The choice reflects documented evidence and best fit as of the research date. Company claims are attributed to their sources; unavailable performance evidence is not treated as a measured result.

OUR #1 RECOMMENDATION

#1 — CBRE Upstate NY

For 2027, CBRE Upstate NY is our #1 editorial recommendation among commercial real estate brokerage firms in Buffalo–Cheektowaga–Niagara Falls, NY.

Best fit: Buffalo office owners seeking a named local leasing team

Our editorial #1 firm for a Buffalo office-owner brief because a dated Genesee Towers assignment identifies the owner-side practitioners and is supported by a current local advisory and research platform.

The shortlist at a glance

Our #1 choice and other specialists
Editorial #1 recommendation, alternatives, use cases and evidence basis
Firm or brokerBest fitWhy selected
#1 CBRE Upstate NYBuffalo office owners seeking a named local leasing teamThe Genesee Towers announcement links an owner assignment to identifiable practitioners.
Cushman & Wakefield | Pyramid Brokerage CompanyIndustrial and office owners comparing metro-wide marketingCurrent named offerings include Cheektowaga and Niagara Falls.
Newmark CiminelliClients comparing a locally led national-alliance practiceNewmark identifies its Buffalo leadership and alliance structure.
Donovan Real Estate ServicesRetail tenants needing a different specialtyA dated Buffalo tenant case provides a concrete retail comparison.
Landscaped office campus

#1 — CBRE Upstate NY: connect the office assignment to the people

The March 25, 2025 Genesee Towers announcement identifies Lida Eberz and Jeffrey LiPuma as the owner’s leasing representatives following the announced Ingram Micro lease in downtown Buffalo. CBRE Upstate NY: March 2025 Genesee Towers lease and owner representatives This gives an owner a specific local team to interview. The announcement establishes the representation role, not the economics of the lease or a completed relocation. Ask how the team would adapt its process to the subject building and ownership priorities.

Use the local platform rather than assuming corporate delivery

The current Buffalo page identifies CBRE Upstate NY as an affiliate, describes owner and occupier services, and provides access to Buffalo sector research. CBRE Upstate NY: current Buffalo affiliate services and research The distinction matters when defining the engagement: ask which local people and broader resources are actually included. Research should help explain a recommendation and expose its assumptions. A corporate network does not automatically make every specialist available or eliminate the need to verify property information at the time of a decision.

Pyramid Brokerage: an industrial and office alternative across the metro

Pyramid’s Buffalo office identifies its Cushman & Wakefield alliance relationship. Pyramid Brokerage: current Buffalo office and Cushman & Wakefield alliance David Schiller’s current employer page lists industrial offerings at 2345 Walden Avenue in Cheektowaga and 2236 Liberty Drive in Niagara Falls. Pyramid Brokerage: David Schiller current role and Cheektowaga/Niagara listings Those named examples support an interview for a different property brief. Listings show marketing involvement, not closed transactions. Ask the firm to distinguish the proposed local team from resources available elsewhere in its statewide organization.

Contemporary office interior

Newmark Ciminelli: compare local leadership and a national alliance

Newmark’s profile for Kyle Ciminelli identifies his Buffalo presidency and the Newmark Ciminelli alliance. Newmark: Kyle Ciminelli current Buffalo role and Newmark Ciminelli alliance It provides a third organizational model to compare, with a local practice connected to a wider brokerage platform. His prior New York City work is career experience rather than evidence of an equivalent Buffalo assignment. Ask for the relevant local execution team, the decision-making process and examples that match the property type under consideration.

Donovan: a different first conversation for retail

Donovan’s November 2024 announcement describes tenant-side site selection for Chuck E. Cheese at Delaware Consumer Square. Donovan: November 2024 Chuck E. Cheese Buffalo tenant assignment That is a useful retail alternative, especially when the brief concerns a consumer-facing business rather than an office building. The source is the brokerage’s own account; its claim of favorable terms is not used as a verified performance measure. Ask how the team screened sites and what information led it to reject competing options.

Why CBRE Upstate NY leads the office-owner brief

The dated downtown owner assignment, named practitioners and current local advisory platform provide the clearest starting point for this comparison. Pyramid may better match a particular industrial building, Newmark Ciminelli a different advisory team, and Donovan a retail search. Have finalists work from the same property information and explain what they would verify before recommending a campaign. Compare the reasoning, staffing and reporting commitments. Public sources support a shortlist, while the appointment requires an owner-specific proposal and relevant references.